With the ‘R’ word looming, a lot of investors are ready to jump ship to shield their retirement. Look before you leap, says Money Magazine’s Walter Updegrave. Sign up for the Ask the Expert e-mail newsletter Question: I’ve been contributing 15% of my salary and bonus to my 401(k), as well as investing in a Roth IRA and other accounts. With everyone so sure we’re headed for a recession, I’m wondering whether I should move my money into more stable investments to avoid losses as some people suggest or whether I should just view this time as an opportunity to buy in at cheaper prices. What do you think? –Sandy R., Los Angeles, Calif. Answer: The only sound that’s louder and more persistent than the parade of recession warnings out there is the clamor of pundits spouting strategies that will supposedly safeguard your retirement in the face of a downturn. Some advocate waiting out the turbulence in cash equivalents like money funds or CDs. Others suggest investing in foreign markets, and still others recommend moving into market sectors that have historically held up well in recessions past. I call this paper-mache advice. It looks solid at first glance, but doesn’t hold up to closer examination. The main problem is that these recommendations assume you can move your retirement money in and out of different assets with impeccable timing. In reality, you run the risk of selling at a low point and buying in at inflated prices. Throw in the cost of trading, and you can seriously erode your long-term returns. So what can you do to prevent your nest egg from getting totally scrambled? Below, I offer strategies for four different stages of retirement planning - early career, mid-career, late career and already retired - that will get you through a recession and a down market while still allowing you to prosper in the longer-term. But first I want to mention one thing that almost everyone should be doing in an iffy economic climate like this. While it’s always a good idea to have a cash reserve of three to six months’ living expenses to fall back on, it’s particularly crucial to have such a cushion now. Recessions dramatically heighten the risk of job loss. During the last recession of March to November 2001, for example, the United States lost 1.6 million jobs. Having an emergency reserve will reduce the chance that you’ll have to raid your IRA or other accounts and disrupt your nest egg’s growth if you’re laid off. As an added precaution, you should also have a home equity or other line of credit to give you another resource to draw on if things get really ugly and your cash reserve runs dry. If you don’t already have a line of credit, open one now, as you may not be able to get it if you become unemployed. Now let’s get to those strategies for different stages of retirement. Early career Frankly, your main focus at this point in your planning should be making sure you’re plowing enough money into your 401(k) and other retirement accounts, not following the ups and downs of the economy and the markets. You can quickly tell whether you’re stashing away enough by going to our What You Need To Save calculator. Just plug in your age, annual salary and the amount you already have saved, and bingo! You’ll get an estimate of the percentage of salary you need to put away to retire at age 65. As for your investing strategy, your goal is to shoot almost exclusively for long-term capital growth. With retirement still 30 or 40 years away, you have plenty of time to recover from temporary losses, so there’s little sense in getting all worked up about them. Indeed, anyone who invested in a diversified portfolio of stocks at the market peak in January 1973 right before a bear market drove stock prices down nearly 50%, still earned an annualized 10.6% over the next 30 years. I’m not saying you’ll see a repeat of those results. But stocks still offer your surest shot at long-term growth. So when you’re in your 20s and 30s, the best strategy is to devote about 90% of your retirement assets to solid low-cost mutual funds like the ones in our Money 70 and, except to rebalance your portfolio annually, stick to that strategy whatever the market is doing. If you’re not up to creating your own portfolio, buy a target-date retirement fund with a date that roughly corresponds to the year you plan to retire, say, 2040 or 2050. Mid-career After you’ve got a few years on the job, you probably have enough money sitting in 401(k)s and IRAs that a market downturn would trigger a big enough dollar loss to get your attention. Which means you could be even more prone to abandon your long-term strategy to avoid short-term pain. Resist that urge. With 20 or more years to go until retirement, you still have lots of time to make up for any setbacks. So long-term growth of your savings is still your overriding investment goal, although with fewer years left in your career you’ll want to be slightly less aggressive than you were starting out. A mix of roughly 70% to 75% of your retirement savings in stocks and 25% to 30% bonds is generally appropriate if you’re in your 40s and early 50s. You’ll also want to be sure you’re continuing to sock away enough bucks in your retirement accounts. While our What You Need To Save calculator can give you a quick sense of whether you’re on track, at this point you probably have enough money in enough different accounts that you’re better off doing a more comprehensive analysis with our Retirement Planner. By running a couple of different scenarios using different assumptions about your savings rate and investment strategy, you can get a much better handle on whether you’re on track and, if not, what you must do to make progress. Late career Now you’re hitting the home stretch with about 10 years to go until retirement. Now that the kids are leaving the nest and you’re at or near your peak earning years, this is an excellent time to really rev up your savings effort - including making catch-up contributions to your 401(k) and IRA once you hit 50. On the investment front, however, you face a delicate balancing act. You still need capital growth because you’re investing not just until you reach retirement, but for the years you’ll spend in retirement too. But you also need to protect the money you’ve accumulated so far. The way to balance those needs isn’t to try to time moves in and out of cash, bonds or defensive sectors. Rather, it’s to settle on a mix of stocks and bonds that can give you a decent shot at long-term growth while providing enough shelter so that you’re not hammered when the market goes south. Generally, that means keeping roughly 60% to 65% of your portfolio in stocks and the rest in bonds. You also need to begin thinking not just about growing and protecting your nest egg, but gauging how much retirement income it can realistically generate. By plugging in such information as your account balances, how much you’re saving, your estimated Social Security benefits and your investment mix, an online tool such as Fidelity’s Retirement Income Planner can help you estimate how much income you can reasonably count on in retirement. (The tool is free, although non-Fido customers must register.) Already retired This is the time when you really have to be careful about market slumps. That’s because the combination of investment losses and pulling money out of your retirement accounts for living expenses can so depress the value of your portfolio that it may not be able to recover sufficiently even when the market rebounds. There are two ways to protect yourself against the risk of going through your money too soon. One is to scale back your stock holdings enough to allow for modest growth yet limit the damage from a slumping market. At age 65, a reasonable guide is to invest roughly half of your retirement accounts in stock funds and the remainder in bonds and cash. As you age, you should gradually scale back the amount devoted to equities, until it reaches 20% to 30% of your portfolio when you’re in your ‘80s. The second way to prevent a sinking market from sinking your retirement plans is to carefully manage withdrawals from your savings. If you want your nest egg to support you for 30 years to longer, you should draw no more than 4% to 4.5% or so of your account value initially and then increase the dollar amount of that withdrawal annually for inflation. This will give you an 85% to 90% chance that your money will last 30 or more years. This is an estimate, though, not a guarantee. The odds will be lower if you’re hit with several years of subpar returns or a market downturn early in retirement. If the markets deliver solid gains, however, you could actually end up with a portfolio larger after 30 years than the one you started out with. That may sound like a big plus. But it could also mean that your desire for security prevented you from enjoying retirement as much as you might have. So you need to be flexible. If the markets head south early in retirement, you might want to pare back your withdrawals a bit. Conversely, if you see your portfolio’s value begin to balloon, you might be more generous to yourself. You can keep tabs on how long your portfolio might last by going to the T. Rowe Price Retirement Income Calculator. Bottom line: The threat of a recession and a bear market wreaking havoc with your retirement plans can definitely be unnerving. But shifting assets around in a vain attempt to outguess the markets will likely create more problems that it will solve. A better approach is to create a sensible long-term plan along the lines I’ve outlined here and, aside from minor adjustments, stick to it. In the years after the crisis passes, you’ll be glad you did. Filed under Uncategorized
Posted by kpantelides 5:32 pm 17 Comments
One thing readers should be aware of is the effects of percentage math. When looking at the quote of “Indeed, anyone who invested in a diversified portfolio of stocks at the market peak in January 1973 right before a bear market drove stock prices down nearly 50%, still earned an annualized 10.6% over the next 30 years.” With a simple example assumming an even 10% per year growth still means it takes 8 years to make back the money you had before the first 50% drop. Posted By Be aware of the numbers, MI : March 20, 2008 3:25 pm
great advices. I am 67 but still working full-time. I have been worried sick lately about my investments which includes the money invested in my house. I have diversified portfolios and i believe my stocks/bonds are what it should be but i will definitely double-check. thank you again. Posted By Michelle, Sacramento California : March 19, 2008 1:43 pm
I think in this occassion I would not stay invested in shares because if we Posted By Ed,Houston,TX : March 17, 2008 9:48 pm
Conclusion to the above: The Children will always owe the past for all it provides, but this is a two way street for the past works can offer create bounty but also offer great routes of damnation. Posted By William Courtland, Waterford, Ontario : February 26, 2008 7:21 pm
Maybe I don’t look at this problem the way others do, but the entire market scheme seems muddled. Beyond the ups and downs of the bulls, the crashes, and the recessions exists this idea that the federal budget somehow borrows against all American children’s futures. Now I might not have clear information on who the United States of America owes money too, it owes more than a trillion to China, but who else. In comparing America to my house and yard; if I need a rock in my back yard dug up and moved to the front it is going to take me time and service. Now if I was to create money to pay myself for that time and service for moving that rock by the time I was done all the work in my back yard I would own a great deal of money, and accordingly my home made personal bank would owe me service in return equal in amount to that money. The rock is worth something but as it didn’t change form my house still has the equity of that rock. So when the nation is in debt, is it not really in debt to itself, as it still owes the roadway it afforded, so as its own populous has utilized money for easier exchanges of goods and services and the Nation has commissioned the creation of great infrastructures is it not understandable that currency is just a tool and not worth anything in itself. The way money is exchange is the main problem, to fix this a greater solution in understanding the entire world’s net worth is required along with humanities provided services and with all this in relation to morality. Money represents the works of the founding fathers and all that has been built upon their efforts, while space is not and will never be worth a thing(unless it is needed on earth in the form of a vacuum), and universally gold doesn’t really hold that much greater of a value until it is needed by life. We serve, and as for the quality of that service we must be rated and rewarded, but that doesn’t mean we are not all basically equal after we die. Just another part of the basic structure of this lone earth. Posted By William Courtland, perplexing : February 26, 2008 7:16 pm
In response to the heading ” a recession won’t reck your retirement ” , I’m definitely making sure that that doesn’t happen with less than a year before I leave the work force . I have 97% of my portfolio in cash . As long as I continue to save 29% of may income every week to my 401k I’ll do a lot better than risking the wild market swings that have depleted a good portion of a few of my co-workers portfolios. In my employers program we’re under restricted trading rules that penalize us with redemption fees if we trade our funds inside of 5 days. This is because a few idividuals were abusing the trading priveleges a few years ago . In other words we can’t jump in to collect gains then jump out before the market closes . I’ve built my retirement with maxing out my contributions over the last 6 years ( 6 figures ) ; a short time that with a pension and no debt , being single I should be ok . So instead of chasing the stock market I’ll continue to save the bulk of my portfolio until the last day of my career . Posted By Jan Bellevue , Ne : February 20, 2008 8:42 pm
A recession may not ruin my retirement, but congress and the fed continually inflating the money supply to stave off a recession will. Anyone who thinks the true inflation rate is only three percent ain’t been paying my bills. What’s in your wallet? Less than you think! Posted By David in the East Bay Area of California : February 19, 2008 4:48 pm
Why is it that the rule of thumb regarding withdrawing 4 to 5 percent of your retirement savings per year never includes an estimate of what those savings earned in the prior year? If those savings earned the stock market average of 7 - 8 percent, your principal remained steady - and you could obviously breath easier regarding inflation in your golden years. Posted By Bob, Arlington Virginia : February 19, 2008 2:54 pm
Peter T. said “If we enter in a secular bear market…” We already are in a secular bear market that started in 2000. We hit our long-term double top in July and October 2007 and are now heading back down. By the time this mess is over you will be able to buy the S&P 500 at much, much lower prices. Posted By Retiringearly, Anywhere, USA : February 17, 2008 11:26 pm
You must be very careful when taking a passive 70/30 approach to investing. Two reasons. One, when the market is going up, the 30% Bonds cut into your growth and limit the potential size of your portfolio. Second, when the market is turning bear, the 70% equities cut into your positive returns from the bonds. Your portfolio will always underperform. Therefore you should seek out an experienced professional to tell you when to be fully invested in the market and when to be fully out. Only if you have income needs from the portfolio should you always own bonds. Posted By John, Portland OR : February 17, 2008 8:39 pm
Count my hand as one that is raised. Here’s how you do it. Spend a little less than you earn, save and invest the difference, increase your savings by 1/2 of the net of all pay increases, and eventually you’ll not only have 6 months living expenses saved, but you’ll be debt free, own your home and cars free of debt and be able to retire comfortably. Posted By Bob Mullins, Bend, OR : February 15, 2008 5:33 pm
I will raise my hand. My wife and I started saving $5 a pay period in 1978. We increased our saving by 1/2 of the net of all pay increases during the next 19 years. We bought and paid for our home in 2 years (14 years ago) and I retired 10 1/2 years ago. By the way, I never earned more than $42,000 a year. How did we do it? We lived by a very simple principal. Spend a little less than you earn, save and invest the difference, increase that savings by 1/2 of the net of each increase in pay, and eventually you’ll be financially well off. Of course, it helps if you don’t create debt, or finance cars. I’ve been a volunteer with Consumer Credit Counseling Services for nearly 6 1/2 years. Posted By Anonymous : February 15, 2008 5:04 pm
All you who have six months of Salary saved up besides your 401k raise your hand. Posted By Denton, San Francisco, Ca : February 14, 2008 4:02 pm
The traditional idea that a combination of Stocks and Bonds will protect you is Bogus! Inflation is way beyond what the Government reports and anyone who buys anything knows it. To slow the inflation rate down will require double digit interest rates, exactly what Paul Volker had to do in early 1980’s. That will drop your Stocks like a rock and make the Bonds you buy now, virtually worthless. Posted By Bill, Reno NV : February 14, 2008 3:42 pm
Updegrave should make clearer the assumption his advice is built on, especially the expected annual return number over longer periods. If we enter into a secular bear market like during the Great Depression, these assumption won’t hold up. How big are the chances of such an event? Not high, but not zero either - what kind of insurance does Updegrave recommend against that? CDs? Something else? Nothing? Posted By Peter T, Minneapolis, MN : February 14, 2008 2:22 pm
Good advice, as usual…but this leaves one big question in my mind, which you probably addressed in another column..but, if one is not to just move things around trying to time the market, but if one’s stock/bonds percents are not in the range you indicated, then how, how quickly, over what period of time, etc, should one adjust? Posted By Steve, Baltimore MD : February 12, 2008 3:33 pm
To send a letter to the editor about Ask the Expert - Money Magazine, click here. CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
|
Got a question? Ask the Expert!
Got a question about retirement planning, real estate or saving and investing in general? Submit your question in the form below - Walter Updegrave answers questions twice each week in the Ask the Expert column.
Your Question:
Name
E-mail address
City and State Are you on your way?
Millionaires in the Making are smart about choosing investments and they get a kick out of socking away money. To be considered for a feature, tell us more about your saving strategies and goals. CNNMoney.com regrets it cannot respond to all submissions. Please note: Any information you provide may be used on our Web site and other Time Warner sites.
Household income
$ Name
Savings/investments
$ Current age
Home equity
$ Occupation
Daytime phone number
E-mail address
Comments:
|
I’m 60/40 in gold and international stocks.