CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market trading After-hours trading Winners/losers/actives Bonds Currencies Commodities Money Magazine Retirement Mutual Funds Taxes Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Loan Center Best Places to Live Calculators Mortgage Rates Personal tech Big Tech blog Techland blog Sectors and stocks Fortune 500 techs Tech Talk 100 best places to launch Ultimate resource guide Small biz makeovers FSB 100 Ask & Answer Fortune 500 Technology Investing Management Rankings Main Create portfolio Edit portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts

A diversified strategy and periodic readjustments will help you steer clear of market madness. Tune out all the noise and stick to the game plan.

Question: I generally review my portfolio twice a year to see if I need to make any adjustments. But given that the market has been down in recent months, I’m wondering whether I’m better off waiting until the market rebounds or sticking to my usual schedule. What do you think? –Todd M., Bryan, Ohio

Answer: I assume that when you talk about adjusting your portfolio twice a year, you mean that you’re rebalancing to bring your mix of stocks and bonds back to its original proportions.

And if that’s the case, then the strategy you’ve been following up to now makes perfect sense to me. As different investments earn different returns, your portfolio’s proportions will shift over time. So you periodically need to sell some shares of investments that have done relatively well and plow the proceeds into those that have trailed - or just funnel new money into laggards - to bring your portfolio back to its proper balance of risk vs. return.

Granted, one could argue about which of the many different rebalancing strategies available is the most effective. (I’m a member of the “once a year is enough” club myself, mostly because it’s easy and investors are more likely to stick with what’s simple.) But the most important thing is that you’re consistent - that is, you choose a method and then stick to it.

All of which is to say that I believe you ought to think twice - or maybe even three or four times - before you abandon your current strategy.

I can understand why you might have the urge to change your game plan. You’re no doubt hoping that by waiting a bit some of your battered investments will recover and you won’t have to realize losses.

But the whole point of building a mix of different types of assets based on your goals, time horizon and risk tolerance, and then rebalancing back to that blend on a regular basis is that you can’t predict the future. You don’t know when the market will fall or when it will recover. You don’t know the best time to get out of stocks and into bonds or vice versa. You don’t even know when it’s the ideal time to rebalance your portfolio, except in retrospect, of course.

So to deal with that lack of knowledge, you create a strategy, a disciplined system that can help guide you through the uncertainty.

I know that some people may see this as a head-in-the-sand approach especially given what’s been going on lately, what with major investment bank Bear Stearns getting snapped up at a fire-sale price, the Fed scrambling to keep the economy afloat and investors worldwide wondering what the next shock might be.

After all, in fast-moving and perilous times like these, don’t you have to be most nimble, most flexible, most willing to try something new?

Actually, no. It’s in times of crisis when you most need to stick to your plan. The far bigger danger in a volatile market like today’s is that you end up making a move that seems brilliant at the moment but turns out to be not so smart in the future.

Or, if you really get into the spirit of second-guessing your plan, maybe you end up making a series of such moves as you react differently to each crisis du jour.

That’s not to say you can’t ever deviate from your plan. If you find that you don’t have the stomach for risk you thought you had when you created your portfolio - it’s not unusual for investors to overestimate their appetite for volatility when the market is doing well - then maybe you need to scale back your stock holdings a bit. And if that’s the case, there’s no need to wait until you make your usual adjustment.

Similarly, if you’ve concluded after careful deliberation that some of your stocks or funds are clunkers that need to be replaced quickly, then replace them as soon as you find acceptable substitutes. You might even want to occasionally sell some holdings in taxable accounts to reap tax losses that can be used to offset other gains or even ordinary income.

But, remember, if you stray from your game plan too often and begin basing your rebalancing decisions on gut feelings about what the market may or may not do and when it might or might not do it, then you don’t really have a plan anymore. You’re just playing hunches.

Posted by kp 12:45 pm 1 Comment comment | Add a comment

I think the individual who asked the question should learn a little bit more about investing, saving, and insurance.

There’s a bit more to it than just “buying and holding…and holding…and holding…and re-balancing…and holding.”

I think that individuals advocating that strategy somehow believe that the financial markets exist in a vacuum. Different sectors and asset classes do better than others during times of high inflation (like now), low inflation, high taxes, and so on…

There’s nothing wrong with diversification, but diversification for diversification’s sake is irrational and self-defeating.

For example, in a market where interest rates are high and equities are suffering, why would you mindlessly invest in equities (or keep the same percentage in equities as when they were doing well)?

…most people do it because they’re told not to worry about it…”the market will rebound”. This causeless explanation does nothing to explain good investment philosophy. Instead the investor is told to follow the herd or “grin and bear it”, because “the stock market always recovers”.

Many investors that suffered from the post 2000 stock market crash are still waiting for that recovery to bring their retirement accounts back to even (adjusting for inflation)…and with the volatile market of today…the same portfolio that worked in the mid 90’s just won’t cut it now.

Posted By David, Elmira NY : April 4, 2008 7:51 pm

To send a letter to the editor about Ask the Expert - Money Magazine, click hereTop of page

Archives
Subscribe
Sign up for the Ask the Expert e-mail newsletter
About this blog
Walter Updegrave is a senior editor with Money Magazine and is the author of "How to Retire Rich in a Totally Changed World: Why You're Not in Kansas Anymore" (Three Rivers Press 2005).
Got a question? Ask the Expert!
Got a question about retirement planning, real estate or saving and investing in general? Submit your question in the form below - Walter Updegrave answers questions twice each week in the Ask the Expert column.
Your Question:
Name
E-mail address
City and State

Are you on your way?
Millionaires in the Making are smart about choosing investments and they get a kick out of socking away money. To be considered for a feature, tell us more about your saving strategies and goals. CNNMoney.com regrets it cannot respond to all submissions. Please note: Any information you provide may be used on our Web site and other Time Warner sites.
Household income
Name
Savings/investments
Current age
Home equity
Occupation
Daytime phone number
E-mail address
Comments:

© 2008 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. All Times are ET.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Hemscott.
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.